Deeper Dialogues

What do you need to say?

Skip to main content
What to say

Money

A big purchase you want to make, or have already made

You've got your eye on the car, the renovation or the bike that costs more than the car, and you know what their face will do. Or it's already in the garage and they don't know yet. Either way you're not really arguing about the item: it's two money stories meeting over one receipt.

What they need from you, and why

The saver and the spender have their sharpest argument over a single item: the car, the renovation, the bike that cost more than the car. Scott Rick, Deborah Small and Eli Finkel (2011) found that "tightwads", who spend less than they'd like to, and "spendthrifts", who spend more than they'd like to, tend to marry each other, apparently drawn to the quality they dislike in themselves. The attraction doesn't last into the budget: the bigger the gap between the two, the more the couple argued about money, and the more that conflict ate into how happy they were together, even after accounting for what the household had saved and owed. So the purchase conversation isn't really about the purchase. It's two money stories, each written long before you met, meeting over one receipt.

Before the purchase, what your partner needs is to be asked before you've decided, with the cost, what it does for you and what you'd give up laid out, and to have their specific worry taken seriously rather than argued past. The careful one needs to say what the worry is, usually the buffer, instead of answering with the emergency fund; the keen one needs to give them a day with the numbers. After a purchase they didn't know about, the need is different. Emily Garbinsky, Joe Gladstone, Hristina Nikolova and Jenny Olson (2020) defined financial infidelity as doing something with money you expect your partner to disapprove of and deliberately not telling them. Across ten lab studies, a field study and real bank-account data from a couples' money app, the people most prone to it were also more likely to choose discreet payment methods, ask for unmarked packaging and hide account details. The secrecy is part of the pattern, which is why the hidden purchase is two problems and the money is the smaller one. What your partner needs first is to be told, and then to say which part hurts.

The Personal Finance Boundaries module's VALUES framework runs underneath both halves: understand your own money story, treat theirs as something that makes sense in their life rather than as wrong, listen for what their spending or saving does for their sense of security or identity, and only then build arrangements that honour both styles. For the big purchase that means a threshold above which you both talk first, set together and set before anyone wants something, a fun-money allowance each that satisfies the spender while a security fund reassures the saver, and a waiting period for anything over the threshold. Telling your partner about a purchase you hid comes before any question of what to do about the money.

Understand it properly

First

Raise it before you've decided, not after you've chosen the colour. If it's already bought, tell them today: the sooner it's said, the more it stays a purchase and the less it becomes a lie.

You could say

  • I'd like to talk about something I want to buy, and I want your honest reaction before I'm attached to it.

    Asking before you've decided is the opposite of presenting a done deal with the arguments ready, and it gives them a real say rather than a vote on something that's already happened.

  • Here's what it costs, here's what it does for me, and here's what I'd give up to afford it. What am I missing?

    It puts the numbers and the trade-off on the table first, so a careful partner has something to answer other than the emergency fund.

  • I know this is the kind of spending that worries you. Tell me what the worry is, specifically, and let's see if we can answer it.

    The argument over a big purchase is usually two money styles colliding, which is why the module starts this conversation with each person's worry rather than the price tag.

  • I can hear this matters to you. Give me a day to look at the numbers before I react. My worry is the buffer: if we could keep [amount] untouched, I'd feel very differently about this.

    If you're the one being asked, a day keeps the reflex no out of it and names the specific worry, which is something the two of you can actually work on.

  • I need to tell you something I should have told you before I did it. I bought [item]. It cost [amount]. I didn't tell you because I knew you'd say no, and that was the wrong reason to keep it quiet.

    It names the purchase, the price and the hiding in one breath, with no defence attached. A hidden purchase is two problems, and the money is the smaller one.

  • You're entitled to be angry about the money and about the not-telling. Here's what I'd like to do to put it right: [return it / pay it off from my own money / agree a figure above which we always talk first].

    Inviting the anger about both parts, and arriving with a repair, keeps the conversation about what happens next rather than only about the price.

If it goes badly

Three ways this can turn. Read the one that happens; the others can wait.

You've said something like

I'd like to talk about something I want to buy, and I want your honest reaction before I'm attached to it.

  • If they say no before you've finished the sentence

    I'm not asking for a yes today. I'm asking you to look at the numbers with me and tell me what the worry is, because I'd rather answer it than argue about it.

    A reflex no is the emergency fund talking; asking for the specific worry turns it into something you can work on, and a waiting period lets the decision be made twice, once in enthusiasm and once a week later.

  • If they are angrier about the hiding than the money

    You're right to be. The hiding is the worse part, and I knew that when I did it. I'm not going to defend it.

    For most people it's the hiding that hurts, and saying so stops the argument becoming only about the price. Garbinsky and colleagues found the secrecy is part of the pattern, not an accident of it, so the repair has to be about honesty, not just the money.

  • If they need time and don't want to talk yet

    Take whatever time you need. When you're ready, I'd like us to decide together what happens with it and what the rule is from here.

    "I need some time before we talk about what to do" is a fair response to being told; respecting it, and naming the decision ahead, stops the purchase being relitigated every month.

Share these words

Send them to yourself, or to someone helping you.

Try not to say

  • Presenting a done deal with the arguments ready

    That's the spender's temptation, and it isn't a conversation. Raise it before you've decided.

  • Answering every proposal with the emergency fund

    That's the saver's version of the same thing. Name the specific worry instead, so it can be answered.

  • "It was on sale."

    A reason you'd give a stranger.

  • "You spend on things I don't understand too."

    True, perhaps, and a separate conversation. Raised now, it turns owning up into a scorecard.

  • "I'll never buy anything without asking again."

    A promise you can't keep. Agree a threshold you both talk above instead.

Afterwards

Set the threshold together now, while nobody wants anything: a figure above which you both talk first, a fun-money allowance each with no questions asked, and a waiting period for anything over the line so the decision is made twice, once in enthusiasm and once a week later. If you owned up, do the repair you offered the same week and don't ask for the matter to be closed before they're ready. If you were told, decide together what happens next and what the rule is from here, rather than reopening the purchase every month. And if this purchase was one of several you haven't mentioned, the pattern matters more than any single item, and it's worth saying that too.

Understand it properly

The words above come from these. A section is about ten minutes; the whole module is there when you have longer.

Where this comes from
  • Deeper Dialogues, Personal Finance Boundaries: the big purchase (before and after), Rick, Small and Finkel (2011) on tightwads and spendthrifts, Garbinsky, Gladstone, Nikolova and Olson (2020) on financial infidelity, the saver and the spender, fun money and a security fund, the VALUES framework, money scripts and where they come from

We gather and pass on what researchers and support organisations have found. This isn't a replacement for a doctor, counsellor or support service.